<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Genius Like No Other</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/01/08/genius/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/01/08/genius/</link>
	<description>An entertaining inside look at BigLaw and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:15:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CuteGeekChick</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/01/08/genius/comment-page-1/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>CuteGeekChick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1259#comment-610</guid>
		<description>on subject  - not all the Firm geniuses are socially inept or idiots, even though there are a few. The ones I&#039;ve seen at my previous Firm and my current one are fun and witty and extremely smart. I guess the type of genious described in the original post usually sits in the office and doesn&#039;t come out for sunlight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on subject  &#8211; not all the Firm geniuses are socially inept or idiots, even though there are a few. The ones I&#8217;ve seen at my previous Firm and my current one are fun and witty and extremely smart. I guess the type of genious described in the original post usually sits in the office and doesn&#8217;t come out for sunlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CuteGeekChick</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/01/08/genius/comment-page-1/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>CuteGeekChick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1259#comment-609</guid>
		<description>&quot;Eileen DeBonis on January 17th, 2009 10:53 am&quot;

Really? No, I mean, REALLY????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Eileen DeBonis on January 17th, 2009 10:53 am&#8221;</p>
<p>Really? No, I mean, REALLY????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CuteGeekChick</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/01/08/genius/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>CuteGeekChick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1259#comment-608</guid>
		<description>&quot;Alex Hump on January 11th, 2009 6:31 am&quot;

Brilliant!!! A few people at my Firm had a laugh :) Thank you, Alex!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Alex Hump on January 11th, 2009 6:31 am&#8221;</p>
<p>Brilliant!!! A few people at my Firm had a laugh <img src='http://www.sweethotjustice.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Thank you, Alex!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Dugan</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/01/08/genius/comment-page-1/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Dugan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1259#comment-560</guid>
		<description>Anonymous, not only are you are a twat, but you&#039;re a smelly one, at that.  You think you know all about me and others on the site, yet you don&#039;t identify yourself.  The first thing I&#039;d do if I were you is to grow a set of COHONES, so that you will feel manly enough to comment under your own name, as the ladies and gentlemen do on this site.  You should next figure out why you feel you have to make inane comments from the peanut gallery.  Finally, once you figure out 1 and 2, you will be in a better position to understand yourself, and then, hopefully find a female sympathetic enough to you to provide you with some comfort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous, not only are you are a twat, but you&#8217;re a smelly one, at that.  You think you know all about me and others on the site, yet you don&#8217;t identify yourself.  The first thing I&#8217;d do if I were you is to grow a set of COHONES, so that you will feel manly enough to comment under your own name, as the ladies and gentlemen do on this site.  You should next figure out why you feel you have to make inane comments from the peanut gallery.  Finally, once you figure out 1 and 2, you will be in a better position to understand yourself, and then, hopefully find a female sympathetic enough to you to provide you with some comfort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen DeBonis</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/01/08/genius/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen DeBonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1259#comment-555</guid>
		<description>I once worked with a guy who everyone thought was so smart, but I really didn&#039;t know enough about the area and also about they guy.  I did remember his reputation though when he came to my office and asked if I had any cigarettes.  I told him I didn&#039;t smoke and then he asked me if I wanted to go out for a drink with him.  Since I was very young at the time, I did not know that he was really interested in more.  So I agreed to meet him after work at O&#039;Keefes for a beer.  He was very protective of me at the bar, but I soon realized he was not that smart after all.  He did not know that you should leave your money on the bar for the bartender to see that you wanted a drink.  So we waited a long time for that beer.  He was interested in me, but I was not interested in him so I did not even kiss him afterwards and I did not hear from him again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once worked with a guy who everyone thought was so smart, but I really didn&#8217;t know enough about the area and also about they guy.  I did remember his reputation though when he came to my office and asked if I had any cigarettes.  I told him I didn&#8217;t smoke and then he asked me if I wanted to go out for a drink with him.  Since I was very young at the time, I did not know that he was really interested in more.  So I agreed to meet him after work at O&#8217;Keefes for a beer.  He was very protective of me at the bar, but I soon realized he was not that smart after all.  He did not know that you should leave your money on the bar for the bartender to see that you wanted a drink.  So we waited a long time for that beer.  He was interested in me, but I was not interested in him so I did not even kiss him afterwards and I did not hear from him again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/01/08/genius/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1259#comment-553</guid>
		<description>Quick comments

-Dugan

You&#039;re childish AND naive?  How surprising...
Your belief that only women can espouse these alleged &quot;female issues&quot; shows just how clueless you are.  A male with half of a brain can understand the reasoning behind these &quot;female issues,&quot; and similarly argue them with the fervor that Eileen and Xuan have displayed.  The fact that these issues appear so esoteric to you tends to illustrate your lack of understanding of the opposite sex, and would also lend support to the possibility that you have serious problems maintaining any kind of long term relationship.

-Xuan
OK.

-Alex
You appear quite proud of your name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick comments</p>
<p>-Dugan</p>
<p>You&#8217;re childish AND naive?  How surprising&#8230;<br />
Your belief that only women can espouse these alleged &#8220;female issues&#8221; shows just how clueless you are.  A male with half of a brain can understand the reasoning behind these &#8220;female issues,&#8221; and similarly argue them with the fervor that Eileen and Xuan have displayed.  The fact that these issues appear so esoteric to you tends to illustrate your lack of understanding of the opposite sex, and would also lend support to the possibility that you have serious problems maintaining any kind of long term relationship.</p>
<p>-Xuan<br />
OK.</p>
<p>-Alex<br />
You appear quite proud of your name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Hump</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/01/08/genius/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Hump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1259#comment-550</guid>
		<description>I agree.  Why doesn&#039;t this douche just go find a website where you can discuss the law against perpetuities or the law in Shelley&#039;s Case (an old babe).  If you don&#039;t like that, go watch the movie Body Heat, where there was an underlying legal issue you can discuss (while we look at Kathleen Turner, when she was still a hot babe--well before the testosterone took over and she gained 100 lbs).  If that is not enough, just go get Humped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Why doesn&#8217;t this douche just go find a website where you can discuss the law against perpetuities or the law in Shelley&#8217;s Case (an old babe).  If you don&#8217;t like that, go watch the movie Body Heat, where there was an underlying legal issue you can discuss (while we look at Kathleen Turner, when she was still a hot babe&#8211;well before the testosterone took over and she gained 100 lbs).  If that is not enough, just go get Humped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xuan Lin</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/01/08/genius/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>Xuan Lin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1259#comment-549</guid>
		<description>To the Anonymous posters -- Dugan is correct.  I do NOT have a penis (though I have regular access to one, thank you).  I also do not need to get out more.  Indeed, like the Southern Lawyer and Alex Hump have posted, this website is here to discuss topics of interest relating to the topic &quot;sweet/hot justice.&quot;  I am not here to discuss the law of Crime or other topics that are technical and boring.  Besides, I don&#039;t even have a law degree, yet I feel that I can understand and respond to the sexual issues raised on the website.  So, if you find this website not up to your legal standards, you should go to a BLOG that discusses the latest legal  cases, if there is such a place.   Good luck to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the Anonymous posters &#8212; Dugan is correct.  I do NOT have a penis (though I have regular access to one, thank you).  I also do not need to get out more.  Indeed, like the Southern Lawyer and Alex Hump have posted, this website is here to discuss topics of interest relating to the topic &#8220;sweet/hot justice.&#8221;  I am not here to discuss the law of Crime or other topics that are technical and boring.  Besides, I don&#8217;t even have a law degree, yet I feel that I can understand and respond to the sexual issues raised on the website.  So, if you find this website not up to your legal standards, you should go to a BLOG that discusses the latest legal  cases, if there is such a place.   Good luck to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Dugan</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/01/08/genius/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Dugan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1259#comment-547</guid>
		<description>Oh, and if you knew anything about women, you would clearly know that those two are females.  They are far too hung up on female issues to have dicks.  Of course, there&#039;s no proof you have one either, &quot;Anonymous&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and if you knew anything about women, you would clearly know that those two are females.  They are far too hung up on female issues to have dicks.  Of course, there&#8217;s no proof you have one either, &#8220;Anonymous&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Dugan</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/01/08/genius/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Dugan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1259#comment-546</guid>
		<description>Anonymous--I just got back from an hour of hot heterosexual sex.  Where were you, playing with yourself.  I have a feeling you are a closet peckerlicker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous&#8211;I just got back from an hour of hot heterosexual sex.  Where were you, playing with yourself.  I have a feeling you are a closet peckerlicker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
