Comments on: Sex, Drugs, and Billable Hours

By: Bill Dugan

Bill Dugan — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:46:31 +0000

OK, will you two broads stop your cat fighting? Otherwise, just take your tops off and have at it!

By: CuteGeekChick

CuteGeekChick — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:08:58 +0000

Ah, Mistress V, maybe I don’t talk much about lacy lingerie and latex, but I think even my earlier comments on this post look different from the rest of the female crew here.
I avoid racy comments, as I like to keep my private life private, and wouldn’t want to be labeled “class slut”.

By: Mistress V

Mistress V — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:40:08 +0000

CuteGeekChick – Fair enough . . . I apologize for lumping you together with the others. I do not have time to study each commenter or each comment. It is just my general impression that the women-commenters on this website are sexually repressed. When I gave examples, I merely referenced the names I remembered. So if you are a healthy woman who enjoys a good time, I am sorry to have put your name next to these crusty prudes.

P.S. You have to agree though that you are NOT the website’s advocate for wearing lacy lingerie, having sex instead of sweating it out at the gym, or tying a guy down and getting what YOU want (so that I would remember you as separate from the likes of EDB) either.

By: CuteGeekChick

CuteGeekChick — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:35:35 +0000

Mistress V – what’s wrong with you? God, now I understand why SL got upset when I grouped him with AH and BD.
Before you put my name next to EDB and Julie’s, and label me as a prude, read my comments.
And if I didn’t respond to Eileen – it was not because I didn’t see the comment or had to show my support. I just felt unnecessary to write anything, because what I had to say would be a tad rude, and I hate being rude.

By: Mistress V

Mistress V — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:05:54 +0000

Can I just tell you how tired I am of Eileen, Julie and CuteGeekChick over-representing the number of prudish women out there . . . If one were to read the comments on this website, it may appear that men are pretty much animals chasing tail and women are goody-too-shoes holding out for marriage and using sex as punishment (by withholding it), reward, or a way to a relationship. Neither of the two assessments are realistic.

Even though men are concerned with sex, it is NOT the only thing on their minds because such things as career advancement, friends and family (they all have mothers, don’t they?), and frigging sport events have place as well. So just because SL, AH, BD chose to only vent their sexual frustrations here, it does not mean there is nothing more to them. Further, this is for my ladies — have you heard of a sexual revolution? Maybe you didn’t get the memo, but women are allowed to enjoy sex nowadays, even (OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) without a long-term relationship. You know it is even ok to dress up in dominatrix outfits and demand to be pleased.

Anyways I just thought that I should comment to somewhat upset the unfair balance that has developed here. Also, if Eileen is using her real name, no wonder she is so bitter. . . “drawing you into their lair”? really?

By: Eileen DeBonis

Eileen DeBonis — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:44:37 +0000

Cute, Geek Chick, be very careful. This group of 3 or 4 men are drawing you into their lair. Sure they can be nice, but they will have their way with you and leave you spent if your not VERY careful. You do not want to go there. Trust me. I saved Julie from the grips of these yokels.

By: Southern Lawyer

Southern Lawyer — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:16:10 +0000

Oh no worries, cutegeekchick. I’ve got pretty thick skin from dealing with real assholes (i.e. opposing counsel, boss, client, judge, co-workers, etc.) all day long. So, a couple jokes at my expense from a cute New Yorker aren’t too bad…nor are undeserving

By: CuteGeekChick

CuteGeekChick — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:53:14 +0000

SL – my sincere apologies. After reading the latest comments from AH and BD I do realize I shouldn’t have grouped you with them.

El – thank you.

AH and BD – I only put “cute” in my nickname, because I’m too self conscious. So, in reality I am drop dead gorgeous. Eat your hearts out.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:35:00 +0000

Well Dugan, if you insist.

“There are douchebags like this at every firm. You are lucky enough to have and work with two of them at the same time. I was hoping you were going to tell us you had a menage-a-trois with these two douchebags, but didn’t have to worry about protection because they were both nutless. But you didn’t. Oh well, there will be other opportunities with men for you to practice your Kegel exercises. I can think of one guy just dying to get in there, the way I am with Julie. Happy new year!” I really don’t see how “I am with Julie” can be construed as “I want to date Julie.”

Add that to the fact that you make other comments such as “I just got back from an hour of hot heterosexual sex,” and that implies that you are either having hot heterosexual sex with Julie, who you were supposedly “with” (though apparently never met), or that you were having sex with other women while trying to date and allegedly marry Julie. Either way your credibility is trash.

By: Bill Dugan

Bill Dugan — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:56:52 +0000

I never lied about being with Julie; I WANTED to be with Julie, but never said anything along the lines that Anonymous suggests. Why are you people trying to smear my reputation? I wanted a relationship with Julie, one that might even lead to marriage! I never suggested that I had been with her. If you have evidence to the contrary, kindly show us. You can’t.