<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life, Death, and Halter Tops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/02/26/halter-tops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/02/26/halter-tops/</link>
	<description>An entertaining inside look at BigLaw and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:11:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: "Is a Nose Ring an Interview Dealbreaker?" by Sweet Hot Counsel &#124; Sweet Hot Justice &#124; All the Dirty Details on BigLaw Life &#124; Entertainment &#124; Advice</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/02/26/halter-tops/comment-page-1/#comment-5132</link>
		<dc:creator>"Is a Nose Ring an Interview Dealbreaker?" by Sweet Hot Counsel &#124; Sweet Hot Justice &#124; All the Dirty Details on BigLaw Life &#124; Entertainment &#124; Advice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 08:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1463#comment-5132</guid>
		<description>[...] break it to you, but Big Law’s a pretty uptight place—the kind of place where wearing jeans is cause for a firm-wide meeting. Nose rings don’t even make the agenda. And if you think that people who disapprove of nose rings [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] break it to you, but Big Law’s a pretty uptight place—the kind of place where wearing jeans is cause for a firm-wide meeting. Nose rings don’t even make the agenda. And if you think that people who disapprove of nose rings [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Dugan</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/02/26/halter-tops/comment-page-1/#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Dugan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1463#comment-1143</guid>
		<description>You tell &#039;em, Al.  I agree 100% with you, my man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You tell &#8216;em, Al.  I agree 100% with you, my man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Veoli</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/02/26/halter-tops/comment-page-1/#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Veoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 02:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1463#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>Snively, I&#039;ve been with women like this.  They complain about you bitterly until you&#039;re in the sack with them, and when that occurs, then they can&#039;t get enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snively, I&#8217;ve been with women like this.  They complain about you bitterly until you&#8217;re in the sack with them, and when that occurs, then they can&#8217;t get enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snively Whiplash</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/02/26/halter-tops/comment-page-1/#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator>Snively Whiplash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1463#comment-1073</guid>
		<description>Eileen, 
You are such an easy mark. I hope you are transactional, because your skin is way too thin for anything adversarial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eileen,<br />
You are such an easy mark. I hope you are transactional, because your skin is way too thin for anything adversarial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen DeBonis</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/02/26/halter-tops/comment-page-1/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen DeBonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1463#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>Me, Making mating noises?  WTF --never with you, fella, or with the other humps on this page.  There are ample opportunites for me to date, but not mate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me, Making mating noises?  WTF &#8211;never with you, fella, or with the other humps on this page.  There are ample opportunites for me to date, but not mate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alpha Male</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/02/26/halter-tops/comment-page-1/#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>Alpha Male</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1463#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>Eileen, you are not my type either What I want. is a pretty young vibrant college grad, untainted by the extra mileage some of these older lawyer women, like you, carry around with them. I would never date a woman lawyer.  Too much negativity; most are real know-it-alls, like you, and most are not particularly attractive.  We haven&#039;t seen you so we can&#039;t verify your claims, which could well be dubious.  Woman lawyers are harsh, not soft and fluffy. I prefer the Scarlett Johanson type to the types of bruisers I went to law school with. Once the women lawyers get much over 30, they also start making mating noises, which is another turn off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eileen, you are not my type either What I want. is a pretty young vibrant college grad, untainted by the extra mileage some of these older lawyer women, like you, carry around with them. I would never date a woman lawyer.  Too much negativity; most are real know-it-alls, like you, and most are not particularly attractive.  We haven&#8217;t seen you so we can&#8217;t verify your claims, which could well be dubious.  Woman lawyers are harsh, not soft and fluffy. I prefer the Scarlett Johanson type to the types of bruisers I went to law school with. Once the women lawyers get much over 30, they also start making mating noises, which is another turn off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen DeBonis</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/02/26/halter-tops/comment-page-1/#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen DeBonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1463#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>Bite me, NYU &#039;06.  I knew a guy from NYU and he was a real loser.  Now I see there are 2 in the class of 06.  Besides, I have 3 years more experience than you in the law, so why would I listen to you, anyway?  I can&#039;t tell if your a man or a woman, but it doesn&#039;t matter.  I am my own woman, and you add nothing to the mix.  Besides, what you call emotional baggage is no more than experience.  If you think you don&#039;t learn from your own experiences, you should go back to NYU with the other asswipers there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bite me, NYU &#8216;06.  I knew a guy from NYU and he was a real loser.  Now I see there are 2 in the class of 06.  Besides, I have 3 years more experience than you in the law, so why would I listen to you, anyway?  I can&#8217;t tell if your a man or a woman, but it doesn&#8217;t matter.  I am my own woman, and you add nothing to the mix.  Besides, what you call emotional baggage is no more than experience.  If you think you don&#8217;t learn from your own experiences, you should go back to NYU with the other asswipers there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYU '06</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/02/26/halter-tops/comment-page-1/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>NYU '06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1463#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>Eileen DeBonis, you are like a broken record and are very annoying.  Do not speak for all women when clearly YOU are the one with the emotional baggage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eileen DeBonis, you are like a broken record and are very annoying.  Do not speak for all women when clearly YOU are the one with the emotional baggage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen DeBonis</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/02/26/halter-tops/comment-page-1/#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen DeBonis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 05:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1463#comment-1033</guid>
		<description>Great, Dugan has recruited at least 1 or 2 new jerks to go with his normal cadre of dunces.  Not only is his buddies, the &quot;Humpster&quot; and Southern  Lawman in his camp, he&#039;s now found some  new dunce, Alpha JD, to take up his cause.  Like we really beileve this guy is more than a wimp!

Who in the world are these dopes that they think the female lawyer population should bow and curtsey before them?  Is it because they now have JD degrees?  Guess what you dopes, so do we women have our law degrees, and we&#039;re not going to be impressed with you;  either with your inadequate JD&#039;s or your inaedquate anatomies.  

As we are our own women, we really could care less if you were all big men on campus (BMOC&#039;s) or are now big men at the office.  You talk a big line, but I don&#039;t see any of you with beautiful women on your arms @ work or after work.

So go home and watch pay per view.  Maybe there you will find your ideal women to give you what you need, because we women lawyers are just not interested.  And just don&#039;t mess up the TV screen in your moment of passion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, Dugan has recruited at least 1 or 2 new jerks to go with his normal cadre of dunces.  Not only is his buddies, the &#8220;Humpster&#8221; and Southern  Lawman in his camp, he&#8217;s now found some  new dunce, Alpha JD, to take up his cause.  Like we really beileve this guy is more than a wimp!</p>
<p>Who in the world are these dopes that they think the female lawyer population should bow and curtsey before them?  Is it because they now have JD degrees?  Guess what you dopes, so do we women have our law degrees, and we&#8217;re not going to be impressed with you;  either with your inadequate JD&#8217;s or your inaedquate anatomies.  </p>
<p>As we are our own women, we really could care less if you were all big men on campus (BMOC&#8217;s) or are now big men at the office.  You talk a big line, but I don&#8217;t see any of you with beautiful women on your arms @ work or after work.</p>
<p>So go home and watch pay per view.  Maybe there you will find your ideal women to give you what you need, because we women lawyers are just not interested.  And just don&#8217;t mess up the TV screen in your moment of passion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Hump</title>
		<link>http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2009/02/26/halter-tops/comment-page-1/#comment-1024</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Hump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=1463#comment-1024</guid>
		<description>Good man, Dugan.  We can only hope others adopt your high standards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good man, Dugan.  We can only hope others adopt your high standards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

