http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2010/03/02/news-roundup-3-2-10/ An entertaining inside look at BigLaw and beyond Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:11:19 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2010/03/02/news-roundup-3-2-10/comment-page-1/#comment-7487 anony Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:16:28 +0000 http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=2531#comment-7487 Are people here actually serious about Item 2???? How does that imply that the victim was asking for it? You people are the reason Item 2s exist. Get over yourselves. Are people here actually serious about Item 2???? How does that imply that the victim was asking for it? You people are the reason Item 2s exist. Get over yourselves.

]]> http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2010/03/02/news-roundup-3-2-10/comment-page-1/#comment-7486 Anonymous Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:57:15 +0000 http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=2531#comment-7486 Not cool re: item 2. Not cool at all. Not cool re: item 2. Not cool at all.

]]> http://www.sweethotjustice.com/2010/03/02/news-roundup-3-2-10/comment-page-1/#comment-7483 Anonymous Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:13:01 +0000 http://www.sweethotjustice.com/?p=2531#comment-7483 Re: item 2, that tends to imply that by working at Skadden the woman brought on a violent attack by her husband. Blaming the victim -- charming. Re: item 2, that tends to imply that by working at Skadden the woman brought on a violent attack by her husband. Blaming the victim — charming.

]]>